Updated: 7/7/2020 | July 7th, 2020 (Original post 4/28/16)
Years ago, Mississippi and North Carolina passed anti-LGBT laws and lots of tourists, bloggers, and celebrities immediately said, “As a sign of protest, I won’t check out because I don’t want to support a state whose laws I disagree with!”
This reminded me of when people refused to go to Myanmar because of the junta, declined to check out the united states when George Bush was president, or refused to check out Cuba because of Fidel Castro. (There are dozens of examples of people boycotting destinations because of the government’s politics that could be listed.)
While people have the ideal to do whatever they want and take any personal stance they want, I think tourism-based economic protests are a mistake because they hit the wrong target, they aren’t effective, and that travel and human interaction can bring about a lot more and deeper change than a reflective boycott.
Here’s why.
Boycotts hit the wrong People
Governments can and do change: laws are passed and repealed, voters eject politicians and vote in new ones, and revolutions and sanctions topple dictators.
We might not agree with certain laws or a current government, but if traveling abroad and defending the united states during the Bush years has taught me anything, it is that people are not their governments, lumping everyone together is misguided, and you end up hurting the people who you agree with.
In fact, you might even weaken your allies by not showing support.
Like, for example, one of the bookstores I spoke at during my book tour.
This North Carolina store is suffering because authors are canceling the events this place needs in buy to stay in business. small independent bookstores are already suffering and this is just another nail in the coffin for this place. They are collateral damage to a law they do not agree with.
Governments don’t always reflect the will of all their people (or even a majority). but behind boycotts are real people and services who suffer. people struggling to put food on the table and meet payroll. They might not support their government or certain controversial laws yet we lump everyone together as if everyone in the destination is what we despise.
And, in doing so, those we agree with and want to support become collateral damage. We create pain for the people at the bottom, the people with the most to lose and, usually, the least say in things.
And, though the shouts of travel boycotters often add to the pressure on elected officials, I’ve yet to see one country or state reverse course simply because of this reason no matter how strong the plea.
I used to say, “I’m never going to Myanmar because I hate the government” and because I wanted to take a stand.
But, when I started traveling, I found it silly that people said, “I don’t like Bush, so I refuse to go to the United States,” as if this was enough to pressure Bush to change or that we were all die-hard Bushites.
It made me realize that a lot of citizens of Myanmar didn’t choose to live under a military dictatorship any a lot more than I chose Bush as President.
And all my protest was doing was denying people the money they needed to survive and the global perspective that could have added fuel to their desire for change.
They Don’t Do Enough
What caused Myanmar to change, Iran to open up, or South Africa to end apartheid? It wasn’t a drop in vacationer numbers. It was governmental and corporate sanctions on a enormous scale.
Indiana softened its anti-LGBT law when corporations and conferences pulled out en masse. The Apartheid government in South Arica collapsed when governments, major banks, and other corporations stopped doing service with it and loaning it money. Iran finally yielded under the weight of sanctions that drove it toward bankruptcy.
Those changes were a combination of domestic activism and international pressure not travel boycotts.
I think it’s foolish to think that somewhere there’s a government official enjoying reports of vacationer boycotts and declaring, “Tourist numbers are down 10%! We need to change!” If they cared about that, they would have done something different in the first place.
Governments care about big business, tax revenue, and those at the top. When you cause pain there, you cause change.
Travel CAN Bring Change
If you really want to do good, you can’t shut off people from the world — you need to embrace them and show them a better way. The way we affect change is by traveling and educating people about the broader world to change their minds.
Staying home isn’t going to effect change. It simply hurts those who might not have control over their government. travel opens people to new ideas, cultures, and ways of thinking. If you really want to bring about change, go there and kill them with kindness.
I indicate don’t we travel to see the world, learn, and help foster cultural understAnding? Du kan ikke gøre det ved at blive hjemme. Du kan kun gøre det ved at gå til destinationen.
Som Maya Angelou sagde: “Måske kan rejser ikke stoppe bigotry, men ved at demonstrere, at alle folk græder, griner, spiser, bekymrer sig og dør, kan det introducere ideen om, at hvis vi prøver at forstå hinanden, kan vi endda blive venner.”
***
Jeg støtter ikke de love, der er vedtaget af disse to stater. Jeg støtter ikke Castro -regimet. Jeg støttede bestemt ikke Bush.
Jeg støtter heller ikke de nuværende regeringer i Thailand eller Egypten eller censurlovgivningen i Kina.
Er jeg enig i behandlingen af kvinder i masser af arabiske lande eller Japans politik om at ”glemme” dets folkedrab i Kina under 2. verdenskrig? Ingen.
Men jeg tror, at boykottrejse til lande på grund af en lov eller dets nuværende valg af leder er vildledt. Hvis vi skulle udarbejde en liste over steder med en politik eller leder, som vi ikke er enige i, ville vi aldrig gå nogen steder. Der ville altid være en rød linje, der holder os hjemme.
En masse boykotter handler om at signalere, hvem vi er som mennesker, og hvad vores værdier er. De signaliserer til vores gruppe, jeg tror på dette, og at jeg er med dig.
Men hvis du virkelig ønsker at ændre dit lands opførsel, lobbyer lokale tjenester og din valgte at foretage en ændring. Sørg for, at dine penge går til de mennesker, der har brug for det.
Hvis du føler behov for at “tage et standpunkt”, skal du gøre det, men husk, at folk ikke altid er deres nuværende regerings politik. Jeg synes, det er meget bedre at engagere folk på jorden, ændre meninger og presse din egen regering eller virksomheder til at gribe ind.
Vi skaber større forandring på den måde end hvis vi bare sidder derhjemme.
Sådan rejser du verden på $ 50 om dagen
Min New York Times bedst sælgende paperback-guide til World Travel viser dig, hvordan du mestrer kunsten at rejse, så du kommer fra den slagne vej, sparer penge og har en dybere rejseoplevelse. Det er din A til Z Planning Guide, som BBC kaldte “Bibelen for budgetrejsende.”
Klik her for at lære meget mere og begynde at læse det i dag!
Book din rejse: logistiske ideer og tricks
Book din flyvning
Find en billig flyvning ved hjælp af Skyscanner. Det er min foretrukne søgemaskine, fordi den søger på websteder og flyselskaber over hele kloden, så du ved altid, at der ikke er nogen sten, der ikke er vendt.
Book din indkvartering
Du kan booke dit hostel med HostelWorld. Hvis du vil bo et andet sted end et vandrerhjem, skal du bruge Booking.com, da de konsekvent returnerer de billigste priser for gæstehuse og hoteller.
Glem ikke rejseforsikring
Rejseforsikring vil sikre dig mod sygdom, skade, tyveri og aflysninger. Det er detaljeret beskyttelse, hvis noget går galt. Jeg tager aldrig på en tur uden den, da jeg har været nødt til at bruge det mange gange i fortiden. Mine yndlingsfirmaer, der tilbyder den bedste service og værdi, er:
Safetywing (bedst for alle)
Forsikre min rejse (for dem over 70)
Medjet (for yderligere evakueringsdækning)
Klar til at booke din rejse?
Tjek min ressourceside for de bedste virksomheder, der skal bruges, når du rejser. Jeg viser alle dem, jeg bruger, når jeg rejser. De er de bedste i klassen, og du kan ikke gå galt ved at bruge dem på din rejse.